Between Conspiracy, Suspicion and Absurdity: Contributions to an Interpretation of the Flat Earth Movement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.2516

Keywords:

anthropology of science, post-truth, conspiracy theories, flat earth, ufology, UFO

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to present an anthropological interpretation of Flat Earthers, a movement that claims that the Earth is flat, that there is a world conspiracy that hides the aforementioned secret and that the Flat Earthers are the real scientists. To address these topics, the paper draws on the literature on the concept of post-truth and the discussion on the “repugnant others” (Harding 1991), as valuable references to interpret the interviews conducted with members of the self-proclaimed Flat Earth movement. They are here presented in comparison with another community ofparacientists, the UFO researchers studied by the author between 2011 and 2014. It is claimed that both UFO researchers and Flat Earthers accuse the scientists of dogmatism (Cross 2000). However, among those who hold the argument that the Earth is flat there is an intensification of the general suspicion about science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida, Rafael Antunes. 2015. “Objetos intangíveis: ufologia, ciência e segredo”. Tesis de Doctorado en Antropología, Departamento de Antropologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília. https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/19242

—. 2018. “Notas para uma reflexão sobre as ‘teorias da conspiração’”. Ponto Urbe: Revista do Núcleo de Antropologia Urbana da USP 23: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4000/pontourbe.5615

Bittman, Ladislav. 1985. The KGB and Soviet Disinformation. McLean: Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defense Publishers.

Carrera, Pilar. 2018. “The Stratagems of Post-Truth”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 73: 1469-1481. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2018-1317

Cesarino, Leticia. 2019. “On Digital Populism in Brazil”. Polar: Political and legal Anthropology Review, 15 de abril. https://polarjournal.org/2019/04/15/on-jair-bolsonaros-digital-populism

Collins, Harry y Trevor Pinch. (1982) 2009. Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Collins, Harry, Robert Evans y Martin Weinel. 2017. “STS as Science or politics”. Social Studies of Science 47 (4): 580-586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717710131

Cross, Anne. 2 000. “A Confederacy of Faith and Fact: UFO Research and the Search for Other Worlds”. Tesis de Doctorado en Sociología, Departamento de Sociología, University of Yale, New Haven.

Da Col, Giovanni. 2018. Prefacio a Fake: Anthropological Keywords, editado por Jacob Copeman y Giovanni da Col, IX-XI. Chicago: Hau Books.

Dean, Jodi. 1998. Aliens in America: Conspiracy Cultures from Outerspace to Cyberspace. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Duarte, Tiago Ribeiro. 2014. “Aquecimento global: verdade inconveniente ou teoría falsa”. En História da Ciência no Cinema 5, editado por Ana Carolina Vimieiro Gomes y Ely Bergo de Carvalho, Coleção Scientia, 93-110. Belo Horizonte: Fino Traço.

Fuller, Stephen. 2016. “Embrace the Inner Fox: Post-truth as t he STS Symmetry Principle Universalized”. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. Consultado el 4 de abril de 2019. https://social-epistemology.com/2016/12/25/embrace-the-inner-fox-post-truth-as-the-sts-symmetry-principle-universalized-steve-fuller/#comments.

Gleiser, Marcelo. 2019. “A terra é PLANA? Marcelo Gleiser responde”. Video de Youtube. Consultado el 10 de agosto de 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1YBZ_zRORI

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Harding, Susan. 1991. “Representing Fundamentalism: The Problem of the Repugnant Cultural Other”. Social Research 58 (2): 373-393. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40970650

Harsin, Jayson. 2015. “Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies”. Communication, Culture & Critique 8 (2): 327-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12097

Hendricks, George. 1968. “Flat Earth Fake”. Western Folklore 27 (3): 213. https://doi.org/10.2307/1498109

Hofstadter, Richard. 1952. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Lahsen, Myanna. 2013. “Anatomy of dissent: A Cultural Analysis of Climate Skepticism”. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (6): 732-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469799

Latour, Bruno. 1994. Jamais fomos modernos: ensaio de antropologia simétrica. Río de Janeiro: Editora 34.

—. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climate Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lynch, Michael. 2017. “STS, Symmetry and Post-truth”. Social Studies of Science 47 (4): 593-599. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44652525

Mair, Jonathan. 2017. “Post-truth Anthropology”. Anthropology Today 33 (3): 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12346

Mahmood, Saba. 2006. “Teoria feminista, agência e sujeito liberatório: algumas reflexões sobre o revivalismo islámico no Egito”. Etnográfica: Revista do Centro em Rede de Investigação em AAntropología23 (1): 135-175. https://doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.6431

Marcus, George. 1999. “The Paranoid Style Now”. Introducción a Paranoia within Reason: A Casebook on Conspiracy as Explanation, editado por George Marcus, 1-12. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Pouillon, Jean. 1979. “Remarques sur le verbe croire”. En: La fonction symbolique: essais d’anthropologie, editado por Michel Izard y Pierre Smith, 43-51. París: Gallimard.

Sismondo, Sergio. 2017. “Post-truth?”. Social Studies of Science 47 (1): 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717692076

Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkley: University of California Press.

“Testando o Globo Oito Polegadas por Milha ao Quadrado”. 2019. Viedo de Youtube, publicado el 18 de febrero por “AcordeiTarde”. Consultado el 2 de agosto de 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BufWsOOP5uc&list=PLvEWqHxhQz_f3QwVJJ2gMNmiC6EFPhDIS&index=14&t=193s

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Antunes Almeida, R. (2023). Between Conspiracy, Suspicion and Absurdity: Contributions to an Interpretation of the Flat Earth Movement. Revista Colombiana De Antropología, 59(3), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.2516