El tratamiento diferencial de los inmigrantes cubanos y mexicanos en el sistema de salud pública de Estados Unidos

Autores/as

  • Sarah Horton Universidad de Harvard

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.1215

Palabras clave:

salud pública, Estados Unidos, inmigrantes, cubanos, mexicanos

Resumen

Se examina la participación del sistema de salud pública de Estados Unidos en una construcción social más amplia, de los inmigrantes cubanos como dignos y de los mexicanos como indignos de los beneficios de la salud pública. Se muestra que la privatización acrecentó la preocupación sobre qué grupos sociales son “dignos” de los beneficios públicos. En particular, se expone la adopción por parte de Nuevo México de un sistema de salud privado para sus receptores de Medicaid, que llevó a un hospital público a desarrollar categorías detalladas de sujetos “indignos”, con el fin de racionar el servicio. Ya que los países Latinoamericanos adoptan cada vez más las reformas neoliberales a sus sistemas de salud, el análisis de sus efectos materiales y discursivos en Nuevo México tiene importancia también para la oferta de salud más allá de las fronteras.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Sarah Horton, Universidad de Harvard

Becario postdoctoral de Nimh, departamento de Medicina Social, Universidad de Harvard, Estados Unidos

Referencias bibliográficas

Becker, G. C. 1965. “A theory of the allocation of time”. Economic Journal. 75.

Bourdieu, P. 1998. Actos de resistencia: contra la tiranía del mercado. The New Press. Nueva York.

Brown, E. R., R. Wyn, H. YU, A. Valenzuela Y L. Dong. 1998. “Access to health insurance and health care for mexican american children in immigrant families”. En Marcelo M. Suárez-Orozco (ed.). Crossings: Mexican immigration in interdisciplinary perspective. Harvard University David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies. Cambridge, MA y Londres.

Contreras, G. 1999. “Hospital defends care of young mom: Family challenges attempted move to mexican nursing home”. Albuquerque Journal. 25 de noviembre. A1.

Cunningham, P., J. Grossman, R. ST. Peter Y C. Lesser. 1999. “Managed care and physicians' provision of charity care”. Journal of the American Medical Association. 281.

Farmer, P. 1999. Infections and inequalities: The modern plagues. University of California Press. Berkeley.

–. 2000. “Prevention without treatment is not sustainable”. National AIDS Bulletin. 13 (6).

Foucault, M. 1989. “The subject and power”. En H.L. Dreyfus y Paul Rabinow (eds.). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Ginzberg, E. Y M. Ostow. 1997. “Managed care. A look back and a look ahead”. New England Journal of Medicine. 336 (14).

Good, M.-J. del Vecchio, C. James, B. Good, A. E. Becker. 2002. “The culture of medicine and racial, ethnic, and class disparities in healthcare”. En B. D. Smedley, A. Y. Stith y A. R. Nelson (eds.). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare. Institute of Medicine. Washington.

Gordon, C. 1991. “Governmental rationality: An introduction”. En G. Burchell, C. Gordon y P. Miller (eds.). The Foucault Effect. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Grogan, C. M. 1997. “The Medicaid managed care policy consensus for welfare recipients: A reflection of traditional welfare concerns”. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law. 22 (3).

Holahan, J. et al. 1995. “Insuring the poor through section 115 Medicaid waivers”. Health Affairs. 14 (1).

Horton, S., J. Mccloskey, C. Todd Y M. Henriksen. 2001. “Transforming the safety net: Responses to Medicaid managed care in rural and urban New Mexico”. American Anthropologist. 103 (3).

Hyatt, S. 1997. “Poverty in a 'post–welfare' landscape”. En Chris Shore y Susan Wright (eds.). Anthropology of Policy. Routledge. Nueva York.

Iglehart, J. K. 1999. “The American health care system: Medicaid”. New England Journal of Medicine. 340 (5).

Iriart, C., E. E. Merhy Y H. Waitzkin. 2001. “Managed care in Latin America: The new common sense in health policy reform”. Social Science & Medicine. 52.

Jadmark, J. 1999a. “Hospital plans new payment system”. Albuquerque Journal. 26 de febrero. A1.

–. 1999b. “Condition of returned girl still serious”. Albuquerque Journal. 27 de noviembre. E1.

Ku, L. Y A. Freilich. 2001. “Caring for immigrants: Health care safety nets in Los Angeles, New York, Miami, and Houston”. Kaiser Family Foundation, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Washington.

Lamphere, L. (ed.). 1992. Structuring diversity: Ethnographic perspectives on the new immigration. University of Chicago Press. Chicago y Londres.

Lewin, M. E. Y S. Altman (eds.). 2000. America's health care safety net: Intact but endangered. National Academy Press. Washington.

Loescher, G. Y J. A. Scanlan. 1986. Calculated kindness: Refugees and America's half-open door, 1945 to the present. The Free Press. Nueva York y Londres.

López, D. E. Y R. D. Stanton-Salazar. 2001. “Mexican Americans: A second generation at risk”. En Rubén G. Rumbaut y Alejandro Portes (eds.). Ethnicities: children of immigrants in America. University of California Press. Berkeley, Los Angeles y Londres.

Maskovsky, J. 2000. “'Managing' the poor: Neoliberalism, Medicaid HMOs and the triumph of consumerism among the poor”. Medical Anthropology. 9.

Oboler, S. 1995. Ethnic labels, Latino lives: Identity and the politics of (re)presentation in the United States. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis y Londres.

ONG, A. 1995. “Making the biopolitical subject: Cambodian immigrants, refugee medicine and cultural citizenship in California”. Social Science & Medicine. 40 (9).

–. 1996. “Cultural citizenship as subject-making: immigrants negotiate racial and cultural boundaries in the United States”. Current Anthropology. 37 (5).

–. 2003. Buddha is hiding: Refugees, citizenship, the new America. University of California Press. Berkeley, Los Angeles y Londres.

Pedraza-Bailey, S. 1985. Political and economic migrants in America: Cubans and Mexicans. University of Texas Press. Austin.

Peterson, A. 1997. “Risk, governance, and the new public health”. En Alan Peterson y Robin Bunton (eds.). Foucault, health, and medicine. Routledge Press. Nueva York.

–. 1996. “Risk and the regulating self: The discourse of health promotion as politics of uncertainty”. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology. 32 (1).

Rosenbaum, S. 1997. “A look inside Medicaid managed care”. Health Affairs. 16 (4).

Rylko-Bauer, B. Y P. Farmer. 2002. “Managed care or managed inequality? A call for critiques of market-based medicine”. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 16 (4).

Salamon, L. 1996. “The crisis of the nonprofit sector and the challenge of renewal”. National Civic Review. 85 (4).

Stocker, K., H. Waitzkin Y C. Iriart. 1999. “The exportation of managed care to Latin America”. New England Journal of Medicine. 340 (14).

Sum, A., N. Fogg Y P. Harrington. 2002. “Immigrant workers and the great American job machine: The contributions of new foreign immigration to national and regional labor force growth in the 1990s”. Center for Labor Market Data, Northeastern University. Boston.

Waitzkin, H., R. L. Williams, J. A. Bock, J. Mccloskey, C. Willging y W. Wagner. 2002. “Safety-net institutions buffer the impact of Medicaid managed care: A multi-method assessment in a rural state”. American Journal of Public Health. 92 (4).

Descargas

Publicado

2005-06-22

Cómo citar

Horton, S. . (2005). El tratamiento diferencial de los inmigrantes cubanos y mexicanos en el sistema de salud pública de Estados Unidos . Revista Colombiana De Antropología, 40, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.1215

Número

Sección

Perspectivas antropológicas sobre salud pública