Intervenciones posestructurales

Autores/as

  • J. K. Gibson-Graham Universidad Nacional de Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.1264

Palabras clave:

reconstrucción, genealogía, performatividad, investigación social, investigación-acción

Resumen

El posestructuralismo es una aproximación teórica al conocimiento y la sociedad que acoge la incertidumbre de los significados, el poder constitutivo del discurso y la efectividad política de la teoría y la investigación. Las autoras exploran tres conceptos/estrategias posestructuralistas –la deconstrucción, la genealogía y la performatividad– resaltando su uso en la geografía económica. El artículo concluye con una exploración acerca de la manera como el posestructuralismo transforma y politiza la práctica de la investigación social. Al respecto se consideran tres proyectos de investigación posestructuralistas que se involucran en producir o desestabilizar formaciones discursivas, y de esta forma participan en la construcción de poder, subjetividad y posibilidad social.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Referencias bibliográficas

Amariglio, J. 1999. Poststructuralism. En J. Davis, D. Wade Hands y Uskali Maki (editores). Handbook of Economic Methodology. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham.

Brown, W. 1991. “Feminist hesitations, postmodern exposures”. Differences. 3.

Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge. Nueva York.

–. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of «Sex». Routledge. Londres.

Byrne, K., Forest, R., Gibson-Graham, J. K., Healy, S. Y Horvath, G. 1999. Imagining and enacting noncapitalist futures. Rethinking Economy Project. Working Paper nº 1. Dept. of Geosciences. University of Massachusetts. Amherst.

Cameron, J. 1996/97. “Throwing a dishcloth into the works: troubling theories of domestic labor”. Rethinking Marxism. 9: 2.

–. 1998. “The practice of politics: transforming subjectivities in the domestic domain and the public sphere”. Australian Geographer. 29: 3.

Daly, G. 1991. “The discursive construction of economic space: logics of organization and disorganization”. Economy and Society. 20: 1.

Derrida, J. 1967. Of Grammatology. Traducción de G. Spivak. Johns Hopkins Press. Baltimore.

Doel, M. 1994. “Deconstruction on the move: from libidinal economy to liminal materialism”. Environment and Planning. A. 26.

Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press. Princeton.

Fals Borda, O. y Rahman, M. A. 1991. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. Apex. Nueva York.

Foucault, M. 198l. “The order of discourse. Inaugural lecture at the College de France, given 2 December 1970”. En R. Young (editor). Untying the Text: A Poststructuralist Reader. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Boston, Londres y Henley.

–. 1991. “Politics and the study of discourse”. En G. Burchell, C. Gordon y P. Miller (editores). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality with Two Lectures and an Interview with Michel Foucault. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Gibson, K., Cameron, J. Y Veno, A. 1999. Negotiating Restructuring: A Study of Regional Communities Experiencing Rapid Social and Economic Change. Working Paper nº 11. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.

Gibson, K. Y Watson, S. 1995. “Postmodern spaces, cities and politics: an introduction”. En S. Watson y K. Gibson (editores). Postmodern Cities and Spaces (1-12). Blackwell. Oxford.

Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1994. “Stuffed if I know!» Reflections on postmodern feminist social research”. Gender, Place and Culture. 1: 2.

–. 1996. The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Blackwell. Oxford.

–. 1997. “Re-placing class in economic geography: possibilities for a new class politics”. En R. Lee y J. Wills (editores). Geographies of Economies. Arnold. Nueva York.

Gibson-Graham, J. K. y Ruccio, D. 1999. “’After’ development: negotiating the place of class”. En J. K Gibson-Graham, S. Resnick y R. Wolff (editores). Re-presenting Class: Essays in Postmodern Political Economy (manuscript under review).

Gibson-Graham, J. K., Resnick, S. Y Wolff, R. (editores). 2000. Class and its Others. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis.

Gross, E. 1986. “Derrida and the limits of philosophy”. Thesis Eleven. 14.

Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Blackwell. Oxford.

Hewitson, G. 1999. “The body of economic theory: a feminist poststructuralist investigation”. En J. Amariglio, S. Cullenberg y D. Ruccio (editores). Postmodernism, Knowledge, and Economics. Routledge. Nueva York.

Jay, N. 1991. “Gender and dichotomy”. En S. Gunew (editor). A Reader in Feminist Knowledge. Routledge. Londres.

Lamer, W. 1998. “Hitching a ride on the tigers back: globalization and spatial imaginaries in New Zealand”. Environment and Planning. D: Society and Space. 16: 5.

Mcdowell, L. 1997. Capital Culture: Gender at Work in the City. Blackwell. Oxford.

O’neill, P. y Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1999. “Enterprise discourse and executive talk: stories that destabilize the company”. Transactions: An International Journal of Geographical Research. 24: 1.

Pratt, G. 1999. “From registered nurse to registered nanny: discursive geographies of Filipina domestic workers in Vancouver, B. C.”. Economic Geography. 75: 3.

Reinharz, S. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford University Press. Nueva York.

Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press. Princeton, Nueva Jersey.

Ruccio, D. 1999. “Deconstruction”. En J. Davis, D. Wade Hands y Uskali Maki (editores). Handbook of Economic Methodology. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham UK.

Saussure, F. DE. 1966. (1915). Course in General Linguistics. En C. Bally y A. Sechehaye (editores). Traducción de W. Baskin. McGrawHill. Nueva York.

Schoenberger, E. 1997. The Cultural Crisis of the Firm. Blackwell. Oxford.

Waring, M. 1988. Counting for Nothing: What Men Value and What Women are Worth. Allen and Unwin. Sydney.

Yapa, L. 1999a. “A primer on postmodernism with a view to understanding poverty”. www.geog.psu.edu/-yapa/Discorse.htm

–. 1999b. “Integrating teaching, research, and service-a Philadelphia Field Project”. Unpublished paper, Dept. of Geography. The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.

Descargas

Publicado

2002-01-01

Cómo citar

Gibson-Graham, J. K. . (2002). Intervenciones posestructurales. Revista Colombiana De Antropología, 38, 261–286. https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.1264

Número

Sección

Cuestiones de método