Living with Oil Palm: Incorporating Ethnographic Sensibilities in Critical Resource Geography

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.3015

Keywords:

ethographic sensibilty, resource geography, extractivism, critical geography

Abstract

Ethnography offers a critical and potentially transformative intervention in the politics of knowledge-making in resource geography. This article proposes a methodological and analytical framework for an ethnography of resources in extractive contexts that attends to their spatial politics. It develops the concept of ethnographic sensibilities and argues that this constitutes a mode of engagement with people, place, and knowledge creation that can add theoretical and epistemological nuance to critical resource geographies. Based on the author’s research on oil palm in the Colombian Caribbean, it suggests three methodological/analytical elements for incorporating ethnographic sensibilities into resource geography: a sensitive openness to ethnographic grounds; an embodied exposure to the materiality of extractive space; and a reflective, multi-level writing practice. From these, it develops an analysis of the spaces of resource extraction and the spaces of community life, revealing their entanglements and overlaps.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berlant, Lauren y Kathleen Stewart. 2019. The Hundreds. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478003335

Berman-Arévalo, Eloísa. 2021.“Mapping Violent Land Orders: Armed Conflict, Moral Economies, and the Trajectories of Land Occupation and Dispossession in the Colombian Caribbean”. The Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (2): 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1655640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1655640

Berman-Arévalo, Eloísa y Diana Ojeda. 2020. “Ordinary Geographies: Care, Violence, and Agrarian Extractivism in ‘Post-Conflict’ Colombia”. Antipode 52 (6): 1583-1602. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12667

Biehl, João y Ramah McKay. 2012. “Ethnography as Political Critique”. Anthropological Quarterly 85 (4): 1209-1228. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/anq.2012.0057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2012.0057

Bobrow-Strain, Aaron. 2007. Intimate Enemies: Landowners, Power, and Violence in Chiapas. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822389521

Braun, Bruce. 2002. The Intemperate Rainforest: Nature, Culture, and Power on Canada’s West Coast. University of Minnesota Press.

Castree, Noel. 2003. “Commodifying What Nature?”. Progress in Human Geography 27 (3): 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph428oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph428oa

Col, Giovanni da y David Graeber. 2011. “The Return of Ethnographic Theory”. Introducción a HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1 (1): VI-XXXV. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau1.1.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau1.1.001

Cook, Ian. 2019. “Ethnography in Human Geography”. En Sage Research Methods Foundations, editado por Paul Atkinson, Sara Delamont, Alexandru Cernat, Joseph W. Sakshaug y Richard A. Williams. Sage. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036861343

Crang, Mike e Ian Cook. 1995. Doing Ethnographies. Geobooks.

Das, Veena. 2015. “What Does an Ordinary Ethics Look Like?”. En Four Lectures on Ethics: Anthropological Perspectives, editado por Michael Lambek, Veena Das, Didier Fassin y Webb Keane, 53-125. HAU.

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066

Hart, Gillian. 2004. “Geography and Development: Critical Ethnographies”. Progress in

Human Geography 28 (1): 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph472pr DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph472pr

Herbert, Steve. 2000. “For Ethnography”. Progress in Human Geography 24 (4): 550-568. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200100189102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200100189102

Huber, Matt. 2018. “Resource Geographies I: Valuing Nature (or Not)”. Progress in Human Geography 42 (1): 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516670773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516670773

Katz, Cindi. 1994. “Playing the Field: Questions of Fieldwork in Geography”. The Professional Geographer 46 (1): 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x

Katz, Cindi. 2001. “On the Grounds of Globalization: A Topography for Feminist Engagement”. Signs: Journal of Women and Culture in Society 26 (4): 1213-1235. https://doi.org/10.1086/495653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/495653

Ley, David y Marwyn S. Samuels. 1978. “Contexts of Modern Humanism in Geography”. Introducción a Humanistic Geography: Problems and Prospects, editado por David Ley y Marwyn S. Samuels, 1-17. Maaroufa.

Maza Ávila, Francisco Javier, Gustavo Adolfo Herrera Sebá y Tania Isabel Jiménez Castilla. 2017. “Palma de aceite y seguridad alimentaria en el Caribe colombiano: el caso del municipio de María la Baja, Bolívar”. Palobra: Palabra que Obra 17: 122-143. https://doi.org/10.32997/2346-2884-vol.17-num.17-2017-1828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32997/2346-2884-vol.17-num.17-2017-1828

McDowell, Linda. 1992. “Doing Gender: Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in Human Geography”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17 (4): 399-416. https://doi.org/10.2307/622707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/622707

McGranahan, Carole. 2018. “Ethnography beyond Method: The Importance of an Ethnographic Sensibility”. Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies 15 (1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11157/sites-id373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11157/sites-id373

Moore, Jason W. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. Verso.

Muppidi, Himadeep. 2015. Politics in Emotion: The Song of Telangana. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749716

Nader, Laura. 2011. “Ethnography as Theory”. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1 (1): 211-219. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau1.1.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau1.1.008

Nagar, Richa. 2018. “Hungry Translations: The World through Radical Vulnerability”. Antipode 51 (1): 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12399

Nagar, Richa y Roozbeh Shirazi. 2019. “Radical Vulnerability”. En Keywords in Radical Geography: Antipode at 50, editado por The Antipode Editorial Collective, 236-242. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119558071.ch44

Nast, Heidi J. 1994. “Women in the Field: Critical Feminist Methodologies and Theoretical Perspectives Opening Remarks on ‘Women in the Field’”. The Professional Geographer 46 (1): 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x

Ortner, Sherry B. 2006. Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power and the Acting Subject. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388456

Quashie, Kevin. 2012. The Sovereignty of Quiet: Beyond Resistance in Black Culture. Rutgers University Press.

Radcliffe, Sarah A. 1994. “(Representing) Post-Colonial Women: Authority, Difference and Feminisms”. Area 26 (1): 25-32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20003369

Rose, Gillian. 1997. “Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics”. Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122

Sharp, Joanne. 2007. “Geography and Gender: Finding Feminist Political Geographies”. Progress in Human Geography 31 (3): 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507077091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507077091

Smith, Sara. 2020. Intimate Geopolitics: Love, Territory, and the Future on India’s Northern Threshold. Rutgers University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813598604

St. Martin, Kevin y Marianna Pavlovskaya. 2009. “Ethnography”. En A Companion to Environmental Geography, editado por Noel Castree, David Demeritt, Diana Liverman y Bruce Rhoads, 370-384. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305722.ch22

Staeheli, Lynn A. y Victoria A. Lawson. 1995. “Feminism, Praxis, and Human Geography”. Geographical Analysis 27 (4): 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00914.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00914.x

Sultana, Farhana. 2011. “Suffering for Water, Suffering from Water: Emotional Geographies of Resource Access, Control and Conflict”. Geoforum 42 (2): 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.12.002

Sundberg, Juanita. 2003. “Masculinist Epistemologies and the Politics of Fieldwork in Latin Americanist Geography”. The Professional Geographer 55 (2): 180-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.5502006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.5502006

Sundberg, Juanita. 2015. “Ethics, Entanglement, and Political Ecology”. En Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, editado por Tom Perreault, Gavin Bridge y James McCarthy, 117-126. Routledge.

Taussig, Michael. 2011. Fieldwork Notebooks / Feldforschungsnotizbücher. Hatje Cantz.

Tsing, Anna. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691263526

Valdivia, Gabriela. 2017.“‘Wagering Life’ in the Petro-City: Embodied Ecologies of Oil Flow, Capitalism, and Justice in Esmeraldas, Ecuador”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2): 549-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1369389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1369389

Valdivia, Gabriela y Flora Lu. 2020. “Extractive Entanglements: Environmental Justice and the Realpolitik of Life-with-Oil”. En “Extraction, Entanglements, and (Im)Materialities: Reflections on the Methods and Methodologies of Natural Resource Industries Fieldwork”, editado por Adrienne Johnson y Anna Zalik. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 4 (2): 26-30. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2514848620907470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620907470

Valentine, Gill. 2007. “Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography”. The Professional Geographer 59 (1): 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x

Villa, Wilmer y Ernell Villa. 2012. “Donde llega uno, llegan dos, llegan tres y llegan todos: el sentido de la pedagogización de la escucha en las comunidades negras del Caribe seco colombiano”. En Pedagogías decoloniales: prácticas insurgentes de resistir, (re)existir y (re)vivir, editado por Catherine Walsh, 357-399. Apora-Yala.

Whatmore, Sarah. 1999. “Hybrid Geographies: Rethinking the ‘Human’ in Human Geography”. En Human Geography Today, editado por Doreen B. Massey, John Allen y Phillip Sarre, 24-39. Polity.

Willems-Braun, Bruce. 1997. “Buried Epistemologies: The Politics of Nature in (Post) Colonial British Columbia”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87 (1): 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00039

Ybarra, Megan. 2017. Green Wars: Conservation and Decolonization in the Maya Forest. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520968035

Zibechi, Raúl. 2012. Territories in Resistance: A Cartography of Latin American Social Movements. AK.

.

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Berman-Arévalo, E. (2025). Living with Oil Palm: Incorporating Ethnographic Sensibilities in Critical Resource Geography. Revista Colombiana De Antropología, 61(3), e3015. https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.3015